<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Jake's Jaunts &#187; Internet</title>
	<atom:link href="http://php.kennedydatasolutions.com/blog/category/internet/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://php.kennedydatasolutions.com/blog</link>
	<description>The endless unravelling of Jacob Kennedy's mind.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Mar 2010 03:29:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>I&#8217;m On YouTube!</title>
		<link>http://php.kennedydatasolutions.com/blog/2010/03/24/im-on-youtube/</link>
		<comments>http://php.kennedydatasolutions.com/blog/2010/03/24/im-on-youtube/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Mar 2010 03:29:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[KDS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Websites]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wordpress]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://php.kennedydatasolutions.com/blog/2010/03/24/im-on-youtube/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I never thought I&#8217;d see the day but shy old me is on YouTube.&#160; What&#8217;s hard to appreciate from the video is how packed the little gym is and how nervous I am.&#160; Well, maybe it&#8217;s not hard to appreciate how nervous I am.
Thanks again to Dan Taylor, Jean Anne Carroll and the rest of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I never thought I&#8217;d see the day but shy old me is on YouTube.&nbsp; What&#8217;s hard to appreciate from the video is how packed the little gym is and how nervous I am.&nbsp; Well, maybe it&#8217;s not hard to appreciate how nervous I am.</p>
<p>Thanks again to Dan Taylor, Jean Anne Carroll and the rest of the Creative Minds crew for having me out.&nbsp; I look forward to many more gatherings, from the comfort of the audience.</p>
<div style="padding-bottom: 0px; margin: 0px auto; padding-left: 0px; width: 425px; padding-right: 0px; display: block; float: none; padding-top: 0px" id="scid:5737277B-5D6D-4f48-ABFC-DD9C333F4C5D:b9a9762a-f6af-4591-a960-0e22a13e0520" class="wlWriterEditableSmartContent">
<div><object width="425" height="355"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/iVCL09Dw62k&amp;hl=en"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/iVCL09Dw62k&amp;hl=en" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425" height="355"></embed></object></div>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://php.kennedydatasolutions.com/blog/2010/03/24/im-on-youtube/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&quot;I&#8217;m not a door mat, I&#8217;m a matador&quot;</title>
		<link>http://php.kennedydatasolutions.com/blog/2008/09/12/im-not-a-door-mat-im-a-matador/</link>
		<comments>http://php.kennedydatasolutions.com/blog/2008/09/12/im-not-a-door-mat-im-a-matador/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 15:18:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mind Omelettes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robot Chicken]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Websites]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://php.kennedydatasolutions.com/blog/2008/09/12/im-not-a-door-mat-im-a-matador/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sing those words to the tune of Marcha Toreador from Carmen and you won&#8217;t be able to get it out of your head.&#160; (If you&#8217;re thinking, what the hell is a Marcha Treador, search for it on YouTube and you&#8217;ll recognize the tune right away.)&#160; It&#8217;s a little ditty that my buddy, Adam, sings when [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sing those words to the tune of Marcha Toreador from Carmen and you won&#8217;t be able to get it out of your head.&nbsp; (If you&#8217;re thinking, what the hell is a Marcha Treador, search for it on YouTube and you&#8217;ll recognize the tune right away.)&nbsp; It&#8217;s a little ditty that my buddy, Adam, sings when he wants to annoy me.&nbsp; It annoys me because it&#8217;s so catchy I&#8217;ll end up singing it all day.</p>
<p><a href="http://php.kennedydatasolutions.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/image2.png"><img style="border-right: 0px; border-top: 0px; border-left: 0px; border-bottom: 0px" height="148" alt="image" src="http://php.kennedydatasolutions.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/image-thumb1.png" width="211" align="right" border="0"></a> It&#8217;s funny how certain tunes will stick in your head while others seem to pass right through.&nbsp; Another tune that is impossible to exercise from memory is the theme to Robot Chicken (&#8220;bock bock bock, bock bock bock, bock bock bocka bocka bock bock bock&#8221;).&nbsp; Once you hear it you end up repeating it until you&#8217;re mad at yourself for singing it yet again.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s the kind of impact you just can&#8217;t make visually.&nbsp; Sometimes a pleasing visual memory can be <em>triggered</em> but it doesn&#8217;t replay over and over throughout the day.&nbsp; It&#8217;s a wonder that more websites don&#8217;t use sound to try to brand themselves.&nbsp; But then again, I guess you don&#8217;t want the sound of two guys imitating chickens blaring over your speakers at the office &#8211; might get you fired.&nbsp; Now get back to work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://php.kennedydatasolutions.com/blog/2008/09/12/im-not-a-door-mat-im-a-matador/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google Chrome &#8211; And Then There Were 5</title>
		<link>http://php.kennedydatasolutions.com/blog/2008/09/06/google-chrome-and-then-there-were-5/</link>
		<comments>http://php.kennedydatasolutions.com/blog/2008/09/06/google-chrome-and-then-there-were-5/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2008 13:17:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Browsers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://php.kennedydatasolutions.com/blog/2008/09/06/google-chrome-and-then-there-were-5/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Being a web developer I usually test my sites on the Big Two browsers (Microsoft Internet Explorer and Mozilla Firefox) and then do a passing test with Opera and Safari.&#160; Normally if it passes IE and FF then it will pass the other two, but not always.&#160; And then this week Google released a browser [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Being a web developer I usually test my sites on the Big Two browsers (Microsoft Internet Explorer and Mozilla Firefox) and then do a passing test with Opera and Safari.&nbsp; Normally if it passes IE and FF then it will pass the other two, but not always.&nbsp; And then this week Google released a browser of their own called Google Chrome.&nbsp; Damn, now I&#8217;ve got another browser to test.</p>
<p>You&#8217;d assume that the guys at Google would be pushing standards and trying to toe the line but instead they&#8217;ve kind of gone off in their own direction.&nbsp; They&#8217;ve completely rewritten the JavaScript engine in order to try to clean it up and they&#8217;ve eschewed most of the conventions we&#8217;re used to seeing in our modern browsers.&nbsp; Gone is the dedicated search bar with a dropdown of sites, gone is the traditional window frame (both header and footer), and gone are any regular menus.&nbsp; Turns out I don&#8217;t miss them that much.<img style="border-right: 0px; border-top: 0px; border-left: 0px; border-bottom: 0px" height="87" alt="image" src="http://php.kennedydatasolutions.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/image1.png" width="181" align="right" border="0"> </p>
<p>The &#8216;Omnibox&#8217;, as it&#8217;s called, is Google&#8217;s answer to searching, bookmarking and url entry.&nbsp; It works pretty well.&nbsp; Just start typing and chances are that what you meant will appear in the dropdown.&nbsp; I do miss the ability to set up my own search engines but I have read that Chrome is supposed to intelligently detect search forms upon the first visit to a site.&nbsp; It hasn&#8217;t worked exactly as described so far, but it IS only a beta.&nbsp; IMDB worked well but hockeyDB didn&#8217;t.&nbsp; I read somewhere that a Wikipedia search just required a &#8216;w&#8217; before your search term but that didn&#8217;t work for me either.</p>
<p>People everywhere were upset that there were no add-ons or extensions.&nbsp; To be honest, I think it will take developers a while to figure out how they want to implement them in the new window.&nbsp; In Firefox I had several add-ons that ran in the footer of the window.&nbsp; Well, now there is no footer.&nbsp; Um, ok.</p>
<p>The Find function (CTRL+F) in Chrome works very well.&nbsp; On par if not better than in Firefox.&nbsp; This is one place where Microsoft just can&#8217;t seem to get it through their heads that searching text should be subtle, fast and really simple to use.&nbsp; Chrome&#8217;s Find shows you the number of matches, automatically highlights all of the hits in one colour and highlights the first hit in a different colour (and allows you to loop through the hits).</p>
<p>Bookmarking works fine.&nbsp; I&#8217;ve read complaints about it being sparse but it seems just fine to me.&nbsp; History leaves a little to be desired but I really rarely go searching through my history to begin with.&nbsp; I&#8217;m a bookmarker and will temporarily bookmark pages if I think they may be interesting later.&nbsp; The Internet&#8217;s too big to think that just one site will have all the answers (er, I mean, any site but this one).</p>
<p>My main complaint would be the speed.&nbsp; All of the reviews I&#8217;ve read have raved about the speed.&nbsp; In my own very unscientific tests I&#8217;ve found that the speed is hit and miss.&nbsp; Some pages, like Google (as you&#8217;d imagine), are rocket fast.&nbsp; Others, particularly long pages or pages with images, seem to load in pieces and take a considerable amount of time.&nbsp; And Flash ads seem to lock it up for a period of time as well.&nbsp; My best example of the periodic lockups would be the Reader&#8217;s Digest crossword.&nbsp; It&#8217;s a timed crossword so keystrokes should be responsive but in Chrome the page lockups up and buffers the keystrokes every now and then.&nbsp; When the page unlocks the buffer flushes and I end up in seemingly random places in the game.</p>
<p>All told it&#8217;s easy to see the Big Two becoming the Big Three.&nbsp; My colleagues think it&#8217;s not ready for prime time.&nbsp; I already use it as my primary until there&#8217;s a page it can&#8217;t handle.&nbsp; I don&#8217;t really know how you can revolutionize a product with such a basic premise (show a web page and get out of the way) but it seems the guys at Google are trying.&nbsp; As long as they don&#8217;t start pushing ads into the browser &#8211; this is Google, by the way.</p>
<p>(Oh, and it ends up being a pretty big download through an exe.&nbsp; Man, I hate those kinds of downloads.&nbsp; My buddy Brian called it a bait and switch.&nbsp; Yeah, it stings when the download is listed as 800kb and then you run the file and it starts downloading again, for a long time.)</p>
<p><strong>Update:&nbsp; </strong>The Find function in Chrome is awesome!&nbsp; Not only does the Find work as you&#8217;d expect it to, it also puts a little indicator in the window&#8217;s scroll bar where each find hit appears on the page.&nbsp; You have to see this on a long page.&nbsp; VERY useful.&nbsp; Very, why-hasn&#8217;t-it-always-worked-that-way?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://php.kennedydatasolutions.com/blog/2008/09/06/google-chrome-and-then-there-were-5/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Get Your Firefox Here</title>
		<link>http://php.kennedydatasolutions.com/blog/2008/06/17/get-your-firefox-here/</link>
		<comments>http://php.kennedydatasolutions.com/blog/2008/06/17/get-your-firefox-here/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2008 19:10:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Browsers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Computers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://php.kennedydatasolutions.com/blog/2008/06/17/get-your-firefox-here/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[And yes, it counts towards the World Record attempt.
The Mozilla servers serving the web pages have all crashed but the files themselves are still being served.  I don&#8217;t think this is well known&#8230;
Firefox 3.0 (EN-US)
Update: Mozilla has fixed their web pages and now all of the links that, earlier today, showed version 2.0 are properly [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And yes, it counts towards the <a href="http://www.spreadfirefox.com/en-US/worldrecord/" target="_blank">World Record</a> attempt.</p>
<p>The Mozilla servers serving the web pages have all crashed but the files themselves are still being served.  I don&#8217;t think this is well known&#8230;</p>
<p><a href="http://download.mozilla.org/?product=firefox-3.0&amp;os=win&amp;lang=en-US" target="_blank">Firefox 3.0 (EN-US)</a></p>
<p><strong>Update: </strong>Mozilla has fixed their web pages and now all of the links that, earlier today, showed version 2.0 are properly showing version 3.0.  <a href="http://www.mozilla.com/en-US/firefox/all.html" title="Get Firefox - All languages and platforms">SO GO GET IT</a>!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://php.kennedydatasolutions.com/blog/2008/06/17/get-your-firefox-here/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
