<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Jake's Jaunts &#187; HDTV</title>
	<atom:link href="http://php.kennedydatasolutions.com/blog/category/hdtv/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://php.kennedydatasolutions.com/blog</link>
	<description>The endless unravelling of Jacob Kennedy's mind.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Mar 2010 03:29:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Why Is My HD Not HD Enough?</title>
		<link>http://php.kennedydatasolutions.com/blog/2009/02/09/why-is-my-hd-not-hd-enough/</link>
		<comments>http://php.kennedydatasolutions.com/blog/2009/02/09/why-is-my-hd-not-hd-enough/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2009 03:20:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[HDTV]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://php.kennedydatasolutions.com/blog/2009/02/09/why-is-my-hd-not-hd-enough/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I hear a lot of people complain that their brand new HDTV just doesn&#8217;t look crisp a lot of the time.&#160; Below is my short list of tips, hints, questions, and answers about why your picture might not be as good as you expected.

Are you watching an HD channel?&#160; In comparison to the number of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hear a lot of people complain that their brand new HDTV just doesn&#8217;t look crisp a lot of the time.&nbsp; Below is my short list of tips, hints, questions, and answers about why your picture might not be as good as you expected.</p>
<ol>
<li>Are you watching an HD channel?&nbsp; In comparison to the number of channels your satellite or cable provider sends to you, the number that are actually high definition is pretty low.&nbsp; For Bell ExpressVu all of the channels are in the 800s.&nbsp; It&#8217;s to the point now where I won&#8217;t watch a show if it isn&#8217;t in the 800s.</li>
<li>Even some HD channels show non-HD content sometimes.&nbsp; I have tried to figure out what the CRTC says about how much content has to be full 720p HD in order to call the channel HD but I have been unsuccessful so far.&nbsp; My guess is that there is some percentage of the day which the channel must be showing full HD in order to retain its HD status.</li>
<li>Some programs don&#8217;t use the highest quality equipment.&nbsp; My wife often comments on how a daytime show she watches, on CBC HD, doesn&#8217;t look nearly as good as the hockey on the same channel.&nbsp; For a show to look its best the signal has to only be touched by high quality equipment at each step of the process.&nbsp; It&#8217;s a weakest link type scenario.</li>
<li>Are you using HDMI, DVI or component cables for the video?&nbsp; The red, white and yellow cables or an S-video cable are not enough to get full HD video (red, green and blue is a component bundle and is fully HD capable).&nbsp; If you&#8217;re not using one of the three types of cables I mentioned, you need to be.</li>
<li>Some programs are widescreen but still standard definition (read: blurry).&nbsp; These are the ones that really try to fool you.&nbsp; As a rule of thumb for ExpressVu viewers (unfortunately I have no experience yet with cable or StarChoice HD), the programs in true HD normally have an HD prefix in the program name, not just the channel name.</li>
</ol>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://php.kennedydatasolutions.com/blog/2009/02/09/why-is-my-hd-not-hd-enough/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hello Out There!: Or How I Learned to Stop Worrying About Selling Out to Sony and Love the Playstation 3</title>
		<link>http://php.kennedydatasolutions.com/blog/2009/01/10/hello-out-there-or-how-i-learned-to-stop-worrying-about-selling-out-to-sony-and-love-the-playstation-3/</link>
		<comments>http://php.kennedydatasolutions.com/blog/2009/01/10/hello-out-there-or-how-i-learned-to-stop-worrying-about-selling-out-to-sony-and-love-the-playstation-3/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jan 2009 03:00:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[HDTV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://php.kennedydatasolutions.com/blog/2009/01/10/hello-out-there-or-how-i-learned-to-stop-worrying-about-selling-out-to-sony-and-love-the-playstation-3/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve done the research.&#160; I know Sony&#8217;s Playstation 3 is expensive and is not the world leader in &#8220;fun&#8221; games or units sold.&#160; I didn&#8217;t buy the PS3 based on what it is not.
The PS3 is an incredible DVD upconverter.&#160; So good that the night I plugged in my PS3 I watched 4 movies in [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve done the research.&nbsp; I know Sony&#8217;s Playstation 3 is expensive and is not the world leader in &#8220;<a href="http://us.wii.com/" target="_blank">fun</a>&#8221; games or <a href="http://www.xbox.com/en-US/" target="_blank">units sold</a>.&nbsp; I didn&#8217;t buy the PS3 based on what it is not.</p>
<p>The PS3 is an incredible DVD upconverter.&nbsp; So good that the night I plugged in my PS3 I watched 4 movies in a row because I was so blown away by the visual quality of the image (Saving Private Ryan, Lord of the Rings: Return of the King, 300, and Casino Royale).&nbsp; If you have a large DVD collection and have purchased an HDTV lately, don&#8217;t bother buying an upconverting DVD player, buy a PS3 &#8211; you get native <a href="http://www.blu-ray.com/" target="_blank">BluRay</a> support, too.</p>
<p>The PS3 has built-in WiFi.&nbsp; Within a few minutes of powering up I had the PS3 on the Internet and I was browsing with their (admittedly limited) browser.&nbsp; Being connected to my wireless network has benefits beyond surfing though.</p>
<p>The PS3 can access media servers on your network.&nbsp; That sounds like something you&#8217;d need a degree to set up but if you own a PS3 just install TVersity on your PC and you&#8217;ve instantly set up a media server.&nbsp; Now I can stream songs, videos and pictures to the PS3 (and thus onto my big screen and home theatre) quickly and extremely easily (even from iTunes <a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-13506_3-10137002-17.html" target="_blank">now that Apple is removing DRM from all their songs</a>).</p>
<p>Oh yeah, and the PS3 plays amazing games.&nbsp; So far I have owned Guitar Hero, NHL &#8216;09, Little Big Planet and Metal Gear Solid 4.&nbsp; I had to return MGS4 because it was too good but the rest are really, REALLY good.&nbsp; &#8220;Too good&#8221; you ask?&nbsp; The immersion, graphics and story were so good that I knew that I would need to devote a lot of time and effort to really enjoy it and, with 2 kids and 2 jobs it was unlikely that something wouldn&#8217;t fall through the cracks.&nbsp; I&#8217;ll try MGS4 when I have more free time &#8211; it really is amazing.</p>
<p>Lastly, the PS3 on screen interface is pretty slick.&nbsp; The XMB, or CrossMediaBar, is really well thought out.&nbsp; So well thought out that I&#8217;ll probably try to copy it in an upcoming web project&#8230;</p>
<p>I wish I had more time to write about all of the things I&#8217;m learning in the home theatre field but I&#8217;m too busy <em>doing</em>&#8230;</p>
<p>Crank it to 11, everyone!</p>
<p>J</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://php.kennedydatasolutions.com/blog/2009/01/10/hello-out-there-or-how-i-learned-to-stop-worrying-about-selling-out-to-sony-and-love-the-playstation-3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>HDTV Myths and Facts: Just in Time for Christmas</title>
		<link>http://php.kennedydatasolutions.com/blog/2008/12/16/hdtv-myths-and-facts-just-in-time-for-christmas/</link>
		<comments>http://php.kennedydatasolutions.com/blog/2008/12/16/hdtv-myths-and-facts-just-in-time-for-christmas/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 20:26:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[HDTV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://php.kennedydatasolutions.com/blog/2008/12/16/hdtv-myths-and-facts-just-in-time-for-christmas/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While I may be pulling the curtain back and exposing the one of the most lucrative markets in North America, below are the top 3 HDTV-related myths and their [probably not-so shocking] facts.
Myth #1: 1080p is much better than 1080i (720p).&#160; (i &#8211; interlaced vs. p &#8211; progressive scan is briefed at the bottom)
Fact: In [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While I may be pulling the curtain back and exposing the one of the most lucrative markets in North America, below are the top 3 HDTV-related myths and their [probably not-so shocking] facts.</p>
<p><strong>Myth #1:</strong> 1080p is much better than 1080i (720p).&nbsp; (i &#8211; interlaced vs. p &#8211; progressive scan is briefed at the bottom)</p>
<p><strong>Fact:</strong> In tests after tests experts have proven that the human eye just isn&#8217;t sharp enough to see the difference at screen sizes and distances typical of North American homes.&nbsp; So while you may <em>feel</em> like you&#8217;re slumming when you &#8217;settle&#8217; for a 720p HDTV to save a few bucks, know that your picture will likely look just as good as your neighbour&#8217;s 1080p (all else being equal).&nbsp; And don&#8217;t forget, your incoming Satellite or cable HD signal is coming in at 720p &#8211; that&#8217;s a perfect match!</p>
<p><strong>Myth #2:</strong> You need expensive new HDMI cabling to take full advantage of your HDTV.</p>
<p><strong>Fact:</strong> Well, this one is about 50/50.&nbsp; Yes, you&#8217;ll need HDMI cabling to get a higher than 480p picture but you don&#8217;t have to spend a lot on it.&nbsp; There are only two standards when it comes to HDMI: standard and high speed.&nbsp; If you are being asked to pay more than $10 CDN for less than 2 metres then you&#8217;re overpaying.&nbsp; PMP: Packaging + Marketing = Profit.</p>
<p><strong>Myth #3:</strong> 7.1 Surround sound is the best way to recreate that in-theatre experience.</p>
<p><strong>Fact:</strong> Guess what?&nbsp; The audio you&#8217;re listening to wasn&#8217;t even recorded in 7.1 surround sound.&nbsp; Even on Blu-Ray.</p>
<p><strong>What&#8217;s the difference between 1080i and 1080p?<br /></strong>That&#8217;s a good question.&nbsp; Well, the 1080 is the number of horizontal lines of resolution.&nbsp; That&#8217;s the same on both.&nbsp; The &#8220;i&#8221; stands for interlaced and the &#8220;p&#8221; stands for progressive scan.&nbsp; Interlaced means that only half of the lines are being refreshed during every other scan while progressive scan means that all 1080 lines are being refreshed on every scan.&nbsp; Theoretically it means a smoother picture during fast moving action but in the real world, viewers have a really hard time picking out which set is &#8220;i&#8221; and which set is &#8220;p&#8221; on typically sized HDTVs.&nbsp; 480p is the maximum that a good DVD player can produce.&nbsp; Oh yeah, and 720p and 1080i are basically the same &#8211; you can choose to have the entire screen refresh 720 lines at once, 720p, or you can have the entire screen refresh 1080 lines every other scan.&nbsp; Experts say that fast moving sports like hockey sometimes look better on 720p.&nbsp; I&#8217;ll let you know what I think soon.</p>
<p><strong>What&#8217;s the difference between 60Hz and 120Hz?</strong><br />Yet another good question.&nbsp; 60Hz and 120Hz (pronounced hertz) are the refresh rates of LCD TVs.&nbsp; Not to be confused with response rates, which are how fast the screen can display the signal from the source, refresh rates are the hot topic in 2008.&nbsp; Film movies and television are shot at 24 frames per second (as opposed to digital which is 30 frames per second).&nbsp; If your TV has a refresh rate of 60Hz it means that some fancy footwork has to be done to try to show those 24 frames evenly.&nbsp; Thus the 3:2 pulldown.&nbsp; Your TV has to adjust the content to 30 frames and this can cause &#8216;jaggies.&#8217;&nbsp; A 120Hz TV can handle 30 frames per second as well as 24 frames, without having to adjust anything (both 24 and 30 divide evenly into 120).&nbsp; Jaggies are bad.&nbsp; Choose 120Hz if you can.&nbsp; This is not an issue with plasma displays.&nbsp; Which brings me to my final question.</p>
<p><strong>Plasma or LCD?</strong><br />Personal preference.&nbsp; Take your favourite movie into your favourite big box store and ask them to show you on both.&nbsp; It really is just down to personal preference now.&nbsp; Don&#8217;t let anyone tell you that burn-in or brightness are issues with either &#8211; those days are long gone.</p>
<p>Get ready for something completely different, coming January 2009 &#8211; jacobkennedysolutions.com &#8211; trust me, it&#8217;s different&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://php.kennedydatasolutions.com/blog/2008/12/16/hdtv-myths-and-facts-just-in-time-for-christmas/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
